昨天被一個女物理學家很嚴正地教訓一輪.
我不服氣, 我今天仍是這?說.
我只是戲言她的Quality Assurance Procedure 作式猶如 "拜神儀式" 一樣, 就被她說成我是 "Unprofessional, 你要尊重自己Profession".
我心中有一根刺.你可認為我是失言, 但不致於失格.(又或她心情差,加上就快更年期,所以事事小題大做--至少我如此認為).所謂專業的"認同", 我覺得是既可笑又重要的東西.我的Professional 定義是:比人多賺點知識, 也許比普通大眾較有水, 但所輸出一定要讓真正的用家認同, 才算對得住本行.
我不認為, 每年站在國際會議上發表論文出報告,一大堆PhD,MSc,DPhil.叫做"Pro".今年的Symposium 最有趣的地方, 就是請了平民病人, 說了得病後的經歷 + 所受精神折磨. 我冷笑: 這就是所謂professionals 所provide 的service, 自恃"pro", 得盡天上人讚美,卻得不到地上人頌譽.
我想我真是沒professional image 的.自認這一點後,我諗有一天我會盡唱她(8婆!)的反簧.
我不同意Senior所說, 我較適宜在外國工作,因為外國較open, less regulations. (當時聽罷不知所措, 不明白如何演繹他背後動機.心想年28,你給我出道跨年題!)
迫機& 奶皿大概意思說: "即是你不fit-in 囉!" "if U don't change,everything is the same! regardless where u go!"
我聽完不開心的原因, 不是因為我不是 "The one who adapts the best (is the strongest)!". 我的疑問是: 我會change to adapt,not because to adapt the gossip-ppl, transform myself falsely to be one of them, and fake smiles. 如果我要遠走他鄉,我要to be a dosimetrist, earn more than what I am now, and Go honourly.
我或許在此之前已被炒了.
3 則留言:
Haha, ya, what a 8 paul to judge ppls like that. Professional or not, cannot be judged by only one comment that you made. And I totally agree that to determind if you are a good whatever profession is how well your relevent knowledge is and how the end-user benifits from what you do.
Work, boss, co-workers, they could make you so frustrated at times. To me, I rather work with a Do-er than a Talk-er. There are loads of bull s. going on at my work place too. I lost my patient, my life is too short to deal with it and short selling myself, so I quitted a week ago.
I quitted, bcause I just couldn't see myself spending more time there, but if you can find your future there, you can make a different, or there are more pros than cons, then hang on there and "add oil"! ;)
Not to be offensive, but don't you find your attitude a little immature? Professionalism and acquired knowledge are two separate issues - sure, both issues are often reflected in the end results of our work, but it doesn't mean that just because you have one of these qualities guarantees that you have the other. But it is clear that both are needed for the best end result, don't you agree?
Of course, who am I, or your colleague to judge you, right? As you said, as long as you can show an aspiring end result, then you're ok... Well, maybe that was what your colleague was trying to do - was she harsh? It sounds like it. But was she wrong? I don't think so.
Maybe she upset you, because you felt that she wanted you to adapt to her way of thought. I just don't see it necessarily wrong - what's wrong to want a bit more professionalism in an industry where even the smallest mistake can cause lives?
Or maybe, she didn't even want you to change to please HER, maybe she just wanted you to adopt a better attitude in approaching your work, to please your patients, i.e the end results.
Either way, I'm sure you'll find this to be complete bullshit to you as well - after all, why try bettering yourself when you don't believe it's necessary, right?
PS Are you suggesting that other countries do less QA than in Hong Kong? Are you kidding me????
發佈留言